Who is better, Sartoretti or Kiraly?
Karch Kiraly leads with a GOAT score of 95.4 against 76.8 for Andrea Sartoretti — a gap of 18.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Karch Kiraly above Andrea Sartoretti: 95.4 vs 76.8. Karch Kiraly leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kiraly wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Sartoretti wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/andrea-sartoretti-vb-vs-karch-kiraly
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kiraly leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 24
No verified birth date for Sartoretti — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 24, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | SartorettiRetired | KiralyRetired · AVP beach tour |
|---|---|---|
| Italian league titles | 1 | — |
| Italian cups | 2 | — |
| European club medals | 2 | — |
| Serie A seasons | 18 | — |
| Career matches | 520 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 3 |
| World Championships | — | 1 |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Beach tour wins | — | 148 |
| MVP awards | — | 7 |
| Seasons at elite level | — | 26 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 97 |
| Peak w20% | 80 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 96 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 94 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 93 |
Karch Kiraly leads with a GOAT score of 95.4 against 76.8 for Andrea Sartoretti — a gap of 18.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Sartoretti does not lead any of the five categories; Kiraly is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Sartoretti: 76.8, Kiraly: 95.4.
Make your case for Sartoretti vs Kiraly. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.