Who is better, Sartoretti or Pedlow?
Andrea Sartoretti leads with a GOAT score of 76.8 against 76.6 for Sam Pedlow — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Andrea Sartoretti above Sam Pedlow: 76.8 vs 76.6. Andrea Sartoretti leads on Longevity, Honours. Sam Pedlow leads on Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Sartoretti wins: Longevity, Honours
Pedlow wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/andrea-sartoretti-vb-vs-sam-pedlow-bv
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Sartoretti leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Sartoretti | 0 | 0 | 44 | 92 | 260 | 540 |
| 🇨🇦 Pedlow | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 304 | 639 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SartorettiRetired | PedlowActive |
|---|---|---|
| Italian league titles | 1 | — |
| Italian cups | 2 | — |
| European club medals | 2 | — |
| Serie A seasons | 18 | — |
| Career matches | 520 | — |
| World Tour medals | — | 3 |
| Canadian titles | — | 3 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 1 |
| World Championship appearances | — | 3 |
| Seasons on tour | — | 14 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 70 |
| Peak w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 82 |
Andrea Sartoretti leads with a GOAT score of 76.8 against 76.6 for Sam Pedlow — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Pedlow scores higher on peak, statistics. Sartoretti leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Sartoretti: 76.8, Pedlow: 76.6.
Make your case for Sartoretti vs Pedlow. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.