Who is better, Zorzi or Kubiak?
Andrea Zorzi leads with a GOAT score of 85.2 against 85.2 for Michał Kubiak — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Zorzi vs Kubiak
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Andrea Zorzi and Michał Kubiak level at 85.2. Andrea Zorzi leads on Honours. Michał Kubiak leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ZorziWinner
85.2Zorzi wins: Honours
Kubiak
85.2Kubiak wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to VolleyballShareable URL · /compare/andrea-zorzi-vs-michal-kubiak
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇮🇹 Andrea Zorzi
85.2
Zorzi leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Andrea Zorzi
2. Michał Kubiak
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇮🇹 Andrea Zorzi5 seasons played · career day 3,28744 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇵🇱 Michał Kubiak5 seasons played · career day 1,8258 titles
-81.8% vs Zorzi at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Zorzi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44 |
| 🇵🇱 Kubiak | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 18 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Zorzi85.2
Kubiak85.2
FAQ
Where does Kubiak beat Zorzi?
Kubiak scores higher on longevity. Zorzi leads on honours.
How is the Zorzi vs Kubiak score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Zorzi: 85.2, Kubiak: 85.2.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Zorzi vs Kubiak. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.