Who is better, Zorzi or Apalikov?
Andrea Zorzi leads with a GOAT score of 85.2 against 85.2 for Nikolay Apalikov — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Zorzi vs Apalikov
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Andrea Zorzi and Nikolay Apalikov level at 85.2. Andrea Zorzi leads on Dominance. Nikolay Apalikov leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ZorziWinner
85.2Zorzi wins: Dominance
Apalikov
85.2Apalikov wins: Longevity, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to VolleyballShareable URL · /compare/andrea-zorzi-vs-nikolay-apalikov
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇮🇹 Andrea Zorzi
85.2
Zorzi leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Andrea Zorzi
2. Nikolay Apalikov
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇮🇹 Andrea Zorzi5 seasons played · career day 3,28744 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇷🇺 Nikolay Apalikov5 seasons played · career day 2,92134 titles
-22.7% vs Zorzi at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Zorzi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44 |
| 🇷🇺 Apalikov | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 43 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Zorzi85.2
Apalikov85.2
FAQ
Where does Apalikov beat Zorzi?
Apalikov scores higher on statistics, longevity. Zorzi leads on dominance.
How is the Zorzi vs Apalikov score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Zorzi: 85.2, Apalikov: 85.2.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Zorzi vs Apalikov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.