Who is better, Thorkildsen or Miller-Uibo?
Andreas Thorkildsen leads with a GOAT score of 88.0 against 87.9 for Shaunae Miller-Uibo — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Andreas Thorkildsen above Shaunae Miller-Uibo: 88.0 vs 87.9. Andreas Thorkildsen leads on Longevity, Honours. Shaunae Miller-Uibo leads on Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Thorkildsen wins: Longevity, Honours
Miller-Uibo wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/andreas-thorkildsen-vs-shaunae-miller-uibo
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Thorkildsen leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇴 Thorkildsen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 15 |
| 🇧🇸 Miller-Uibo | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 20 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ThorkildsenRetired | Miller-UiboActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 2 | 2 |
| World Championship golds | 1 | 1 |
| European titles | 2 | — |
| Best throw in metres | 91.59 | — |
| Diamond League titles | 2 | 3 |
| 400 m personal best | — | 48.36 |
| World Championship medals | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 90 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteAndreas Thorkildsen leads with a GOAT score of 88.0 against 87.9 for Shaunae Miller-Uibo — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Miller-Uibo scores higher on peak, statistics. Thorkildsen leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Thorkildsen: 88.0, Miller-Uibo: 87.9.
Make your case for Thorkildsen vs Miller-Uibo. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.