Who is better, Gimeno or Andreescu?
Bianca Andreescu leads with a GOAT score of 76.3 against 76.2 for Andrés Gimeno — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Bianca Andreescu above Andrés Gimeno: 76.3 vs 76.2. Bianca Andreescu leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours. Andrés Gimeno leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Andreescu wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Gimeno wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/andres-gimeno-vs-bianca-andreescu
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Andreescu leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇸 Gimeno | 0 | 0 | 48 | 100 | 217 | 582 |
| 🇨🇦 Andreescu | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 9 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GimenoRetired | AndreescuActive |
|---|---|---|
| Major singles titles | 1 | — |
| Major finals | 2 | — |
| Professional tour titles | 15 | — |
| Career-high world ranking | 4 | — |
| Seasons on tour | 14 | — |
| Grand Slam singles titles | — | 1 |
| WTA titles | — | 3 |
| Masters titles | — | 1 |
| Career-high ranking | — | 4 |
| Billie Jean King Cup appearances | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 58 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 78 |
Bianca Andreescu leads with a GOAT score of 76.3 against 76.2 for Andrés Gimeno — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Gimeno scores higher on longevity. Andreescu leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Gimeno: 76.2, Andreescu: 76.3.
Make your case for Gimeno vs Andreescu. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.