Who is better, Gimeno or Djokovic?
Novak Djokovic leads with a GOAT score of 97.6 against 76.2 for Andrés Gimeno — a gap of 21.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Novak Djokovic above Andrés Gimeno: 97.6 vs 76.2. Novak Djokovic leads on Dominance, Honours, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Djokovic wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Gimeno wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/andres-gimeno-vs-djokovic
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Djokovic leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Gimeno — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | GimenoRetired | DjokovicActive |
|---|---|---|
| Major singles titles | 1 | — |
| Major finals | 2 | — |
| Professional tour titles | 15 | — |
| Career-high world ranking | 4 | — |
| Seasons on tour | 14 | — |
| Grand Slam titles | — | 24 |
| Weeks at No. 1 | — | 428 |
| Masters 1000 titles | — | 40 |
| Career titles | — | 99 |
| Match win % | — | 83.2% |
| Year-end No. 1 finishes | — | 8 |
| Olympic gold | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 99 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 97 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 99 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 96 |
Novak Djokovic leads with a GOAT score of 97.6 against 76.2 for Andrés Gimeno — a gap of 21.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Gimeno does not lead any of the five categories; Djokovic is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Gimeno: 76.2, Djokovic: 97.6.
Make your case for Gimeno vs Djokovic. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.