Who is better, Nocioni or Free?
Andrés Nocioni leads with a GOAT score of 80.2 against 79.9 for World B. Free — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Andrés Nocioni above World B. Free: 80.2 vs 79.9. Andrés Nocioni leads on Honours, Longevity. World B. Free leads on Statistics, Peak, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Nocioni wins: Longevity, Honours
Free wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/andres-nocioni-vs-world-b-free
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Nocioni leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇷 Nocioni | 0 | 0 | 48 | 104 | 308 | 656 |
| 🇺🇸 Free | 0 | 0 | 8 | 24.3 | 99 | 188.7 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | NocioniRetired | FreeRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| EuroLeague titles | 1 | — |
| Spanish league titles | 4 | — |
| NBA seasons | 8 | — |
| Argentina caps | 130 | — |
| All-Star selections | — | 1 |
| Career points | — | 17,955 |
| Career points per game | — | 20.3 |
| Best season scoring average | — | 30.2 |
| Seasons over 20 points per game | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 86 |
Andrés Nocioni leads with a GOAT score of 80.2 against 79.9 for World B. Free — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Free scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Nocioni leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Nocioni: 80.2, Free: 79.9.
Make your case for Nocioni vs Free. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.