Who is better, Flintoff or Chappell?
Andrew Flintoff leads with a GOAT score of 86.4 against 86.3 for Ian Chappell — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Andrew Flintoff above Ian Chappell: 86.4 vs 86.3. Andrew Flintoff leads on Peak, Statistics. Ian Chappell leads on Longevity, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Flintoff wins: Peak, Statistics
Chappell wins: Dominance, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/andrew-flintoff-vs-ian-chappell
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Flintoff leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Flintoff | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 170 |
| 🇦🇺 Chappell | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 23 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FlintoffRetired | ChappellRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Test wickets | 226 | — |
| Test runs | 3,845 | 5,345 |
| Ashes series won | 2 | — |
| Man of the Series awards | 3 | — |
| Tests played | 79 | — |
| Test centuries | — | 14 |
| Tests as captain | — | 30 |
| Series won as captain | — | 15 |
| Test batting average | — | 42.42 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 88 |
Andrew Flintoff leads with a GOAT score of 86.4 against 86.3 for Ian Chappell — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Chappell scores higher on dominance, longevity. Flintoff leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Flintoff: 86.4, Chappell: 86.3.
Make your case for Flintoff vs Chappell. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.