Who is better, Strauss or Attewell?
Andrew Strauss leads with a GOAT score of 86.7 against 86.7 for William Attewell — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Andrew Strauss and William Attewell level at 86.7. Andrew Strauss leads on Honours, Peak. William Attewell leads on Longevity, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Strauss wins: Peak, Honours
Attewell wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/andrew-strauss-vs-william-attewell
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Strauss leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Strauss | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 156 |
| 🇬🇧 Attewell | 0 | 0 | 45 | 95 | 275 | 585 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | StraussRetired | AttewellRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Ashes series won as captain | 2 | — |
| Test runs | 7,037 | — |
| Test centuries | 21 | — |
| Tests as captain | 50 | — |
| Test wins as captain | 24 | — |
| First-class wickets | — | 1,951 |
| First-class average | — | 15 |
| Test wickets | — | 28 |
| Seasons with 100 wickets | — | 10 |
| Tests played | — | 10 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 94 |
Andrew Strauss leads with a GOAT score of 86.7 against 86.7 for William Attewell — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Attewell scores higher on dominance, statistics, longevity. Strauss leads on peak, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Strauss: 86.7, Attewell: 86.7.
Make your case for Strauss vs Attewell. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.