Who is better, Abduvaliyev or Alfred?
Andrey Abduvaliyev leads with a GOAT score of 87.0 against 86.8 for Julien Alfred — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Andrey Abduvaliyev above Julien Alfred: 87.0 vs 86.8. Andrey Abduvaliyev leads on Longevity. Julien Alfred leads on Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Abduvaliyev wins: Longevity
Alfred wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/andrey-abduvaliyev-vs-julien-alfred
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Abduvaliyev leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇹🇯 Abduvaliyev | 0 | 0 | 45 | 103 | 258 | 647 |
| 🇱🇨 Alfred | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11.19 | 44.16 | 76.47 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AbduvaliyevRetired | AlfredActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| World Championship titles | 2 | — |
| Personal best in centimetres | 8,458 | — |
| World Championship medals | 2 | — |
| Asian Games titles | 1 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| Olympic medals | — | 2 |
| World indoor golds | — | 1 |
| 100 m best | — | 10.72 |
| NCAA titles | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 94 |
Andrey Abduvaliyev leads with a GOAT score of 87.0 against 86.8 for Julien Alfred — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Alfred scores higher on peak, statistics. Abduvaliyev leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Abduvaliyev: 87.0, Alfred: 86.8.
Make your case for Abduvaliyev vs Alfred. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.