Who is better, Abduvaliyev or Gidey?
Andrey Abduvaliyev leads with a GOAT score of 87.0 against 87.0 for Letesenbet Gidey — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Andrey Abduvaliyev and Letesenbet Gidey level at 87.0. Andrey Abduvaliyev leads on Longevity, Honours. Letesenbet Gidey leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Abduvaliyev wins: Longevity, Honours
Gidey wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/andrey-abduvaliyev-vs-letesenbet-gidey
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Abduvaliyev leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇹🇯 Abduvaliyev | 0 | 0 | 45 | 103 | 258 | 647 |
| 🇪🇹 Gidey | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 19 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AbduvaliyevRetired | GideyActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| World Championship titles | 2 | — |
| Personal best in centimetres | 8,458 | — |
| World Championship medals | 2 | — |
| Asian Games titles | 1 | — |
| World records | — | 3 |
| World Championship golds | — | 1 |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| World cross country titles | — | 2 |
| 10,000 m world record in minutes | — | 29.01 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 92 |
Andrey Abduvaliyev leads with a GOAT score of 87.0 against 87.0 for Letesenbet Gidey — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Gidey scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Abduvaliyev leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Abduvaliyev: 87.0, Gidey: 87.0.
Make your case for Abduvaliyev vs Gidey. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.