Who is better, Murray or Pietrangeli?
Nicola Pietrangeli leads with a GOAT score of 85.5 against 85.4 for Andy Murray — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Nicola Pietrangeli above Andy Murray: 85.5 vs 85.4. Nicola Pietrangeli leads on Statistics, Peak, Longevity. Andy Murray leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Pietrangeli wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Murray wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/andy-murray-vs-nicola-pietrangeli
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Pietrangeli leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Murray | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 26 |
| 🇮🇹 Pietrangeli | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 29 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MurrayRetired | PietrangeliRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam titles | 3 | — |
| Olympic golds | 2 | — |
| Career titles | 46 | 48 |
| Weeks at No. 1 | 41 | — |
| Masters 1000 titles | 14 | — |
| Davis Cups | 1 | — |
| Grand Slam singles titles | — | 2 |
| Grand Slam doubles titles | — | 1 |
| Davis Cup matches | — | 164 |
| Davis Cup wins | — | 120 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 90 |
Nicola Pietrangeli leads with a GOAT score of 85.5 against 85.4 for Andy Murray — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Murray scores higher on dominance, honours. Pietrangeli leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Murray: 85.4, Pietrangeli: 85.5.
Make your case for Murray vs Pietrangeli. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.