Who is better, Roddick or Medvedev?
Daniil Medvedev leads with a GOAT score of 85.7 against 85.6 for Andy Roddick — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Roddick vs Medvedev
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Daniil Medvedev above Andy Roddick: 85.7 vs 85.6. Daniil Medvedev leads on Dominance. Andy Roddick leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MedvedevWinner
85.7Medvedev wins: Dominance
Roddick
85.6Roddick wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to TennisShareable URL · /compare/andy-roddick-vs-daniil-medvedev
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇷🇺 Daniil Medvedev
85.7
Medvedev leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Daniil Medvedev
2. Andy Roddick
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Andy Roddick5 seasons played · career day 2,19121 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇷🇺 Daniil Medvedev5 seasons played · career day 2,92115 titles
-28.6% vs Roddick at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Roddick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 28 |
| 🇷🇺 Medvedev | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 17 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Medvedev85.7
Roddick85.6
FAQ
Where does Roddick beat Medvedev?
Roddick scores higher on longevity. Medvedev leads on dominance.
How is the Roddick vs Medvedev score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Roddick: 85.6, Medvedev: 85.7.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Roddick vs Medvedev. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.