GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Roddick vs Pietrangeli

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
RoddickWinner
85.6

Roddick wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Pietrangeli
85.5

Pietrangeli wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/andy-roddick-vs-nicola-pietrangeli

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Andy Roddick
85.6

Roddick leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. US Open champion in 2003, world No. 1 and a four-time Wimbledon finalist.

1. Andy Roddick
85.6
2. Nicola Pietrangeli
85.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇺🇸 Andy Roddick5 seasons played · career day 2,19121 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇮🇹 Nicola Pietrangeli5 seasons played · career day 2,55520 titles
-4.8% vs Roddick at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Roddick00021328
🇮🇹 Pietrangeli0000929

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricRoddickRetiredPietrangeliRetired
Grand Slam singles titles12
ATP titles32
Weeks at No. 113
Davis Cup titles1
Grand Slam finals5
Grand Slam doubles titles1
Davis Cup matches164
Davis Cup wins120
Career titles48
Dominance w25%8280
Peak w20%9490
Longevity w20%8088
Honours w20%8482
Statistics w15%9090

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Roddick85.6
Pietrangeli85.5
The people
Roddick
Pietrangeli

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Roddick vs Pietrangeli. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →