Who is better, James or Béliveau?
Jean Béliveau leads with a GOAT score of 90.0 against 89.9 for Angela James — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jean Béliveau above Angela James: 90.0 vs 89.9. Jean Béliveau leads on Longevity, Honours. Angela James leads on Peak, Statistics, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Béliveau wins: Longevity, Honours
James wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/angela-james-vs-jean-beliveau
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Béliveau leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 James | 0 | 0 | 55 | 119 | 361 | 721 |
| 🇨🇦 Béliveau | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 107 | 429 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | JamesRetired | BéliveauRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship titles | 4 | — |
| World Championship goals | 22 | — |
| National league titles | 8 | — |
| Hall of Fame inductions | 2 | — |
| Seasons played | 16 | — |
| Stanley Cups | — | 10 |
| Hart Trophies | — | 2 |
| Art Ross Trophies | — | 1 |
| Conn Smythe Trophies | — | 1 |
| NHL points | — | 1,219 |
| All-Star selections | — | 13 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 94 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 88 |
Jean Béliveau leads with a GOAT score of 90.0 against 89.9 for Angela James — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
James scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Béliveau leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. James: 89.9, Béliveau: 90.0.
Make your case for James vs Béliveau. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.