Who is better, Kerber or Hughes?
Geoff Hughes leads with a GOAT score of 75.9 against 75.8 for Angelique Kerber — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Geoff Hughes above Angelique Kerber: 75.9 vs 75.8. Geoff Hughes leads on Statistics, Peak, Longevity. Angelique Kerber leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hughes wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Kerber wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/angelique-kerber-vs-geoff-hughes-tennis
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hughes leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Kerber | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 🇦🇺 Hughes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 41 | 69 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KerberRetired | HughesRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam titles | 3 | — |
| Weeks at No. 1 | 34 | — |
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| Career singles titles | 14 | — |
| Career match wins | 630 | — |
| Grand Slam doubles titles | — | 1 |
| Grand Slam finals | — | 2 |
| Davis Cup ties played | — | 6 |
| National tournament wins | — | 5 |
| Career years | — | 11 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 66 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 84 |
Geoff Hughes leads with a GOAT score of 75.9 against 75.8 for Angelique Kerber — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Kerber scores higher on dominance, honours. Hughes leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kerber: 75.8, Hughes: 75.9.
Make your case for Kerber vs Hughes. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.