Who is better, Mathews or Majid?
Majid Khan leads with a GOAT score of 86.3 against 86.1 for Angelo Mathews — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Mathews vs Majid
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Majid Khan above Angelo Mathews: 86.3 vs 86.1. Majid Khan leads on Dominance, Peak. Angelo Mathews leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MajidWinner
86.3Majid wins: Dominance, Peak
Mathews
86.1Mathews wins: Longevity, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/angelo-mathews-vs-majid-khan
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇵🇰 Majid Khan
86.3
Majid leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Majid Khan
2. Angelo Mathews
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇱🇰 Angelo Mathews5 years played · career day 2,191190 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇵🇰 Majid Khan5 years played · career day 2,921180 runs
-5.3% vs Mathews at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇱🇰 Mathews | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 96 | 358 |
| 🇵🇰 Majid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 54 | 232 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Majid86.3
Mathews86.1
FAQ
Where does Mathews beat Majid?
Mathews scores higher on statistics, longevity. Majid leads on peak, dominance.
How is the Mathews vs Majid score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Mathews: 86.1, Majid: 86.3.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Mathews vs Majid. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.