Who is better, Bainbridge or Watanabe?
Angie Bainbridge leads with a GOAT score of 78.9 against 78.8 for Ippei Watanabe — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Angie Bainbridge above Ippei Watanabe: 78.9 vs 78.8. Angie Bainbridge leads on Longevity, Honours, Statistics. Ippei Watanabe leads on Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bainbridge wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Watanabe wins: Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/angie-bainbridge-vs-ippei-watanabe
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bainbridge leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Bainbridge | 0 | 0 | 52 | 114 | 266 | 616 |
| 🇯🇵 Watanabe | 0 | 0 | 55 | 123 | 387 | 699 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BainbridgeRetired | WatanabeActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| Commonwealth Games gold medals | 2 | — |
| World Championship medals | 2 | 1 |
| Australian titles | 3 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 1 | — |
| World records | — | 1 |
| Asian Games golds | — | 1 |
| Japanese titles | — | 5 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 85 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 82 |
Angie Bainbridge leads with a GOAT score of 78.9 against 78.8 for Ippei Watanabe — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Watanabe scores higher on peak. Bainbridge leads on honours, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bainbridge: 78.9, Watanabe: 78.8.
Make your case for Bainbridge vs Watanabe. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.