Who is better, Włodarczyk or Kostadinova?
Anita Włodarczyk leads with a GOAT score of 89.9 against 89.9 for Stefka Kostadinova — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Anita Włodarczyk and Stefka Kostadinova level at 89.9. Anita Włodarczyk leads on Honours. Stefka Kostadinova leads on Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Włodarczyk wins: Honours
Kostadinova wins: Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/anita-wlodarczyk-vs-stefka-kostadinova
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Włodarczyk leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇱 Włodarczyk | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 156.26 | 468.4 |
| 🇧🇬 Kostadinova | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.11 | 14.27 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | WłodarczykActive | KostadinovaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 3 | 1 |
| World Championship golds | 4 | 2 |
| World records | 6 | 1 |
| Hammer world record (m) | 82.98 | — |
| European golds | 4 | — |
| Throws over 80 m | 30 | — |
| World Indoor golds | — | 5 |
| Best jump (m) | — | 2.09 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 92 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteAnita Włodarczyk leads with a GOAT score of 89.9 against 89.9 for Stefka Kostadinova — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Kostadinova scores higher on peak. Włodarczyk leads on honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Włodarczyk: 89.9, Kostadinova: 89.9.
Make your case for Włodarczyk vs Kostadinova. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.