Who is better, Behmer or Fosbury?
Dick Fosbury leads with a GOAT score of 75.5 against 75.3 for Anke Behmer — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Dick Fosbury above Anke Behmer: 75.5 vs 75.3. Dick Fosbury leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Anke Behmer leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Fosbury wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Behmer wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/anke-behmer-vs-dick-fosbury
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Fosbury leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Behmer | 0 | 0 | 55 | 119 | 357 | 711 |
| 🇺🇸 Fosbury | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.19 | 14.79 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BehmerRetired | FosburyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| European Championship medals | 2 | — |
| Personal best (points) | 6,858 | — |
| National titles | 3 | — |
| Global finals contested | 4 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| Olympic records | — | 1 |
| NCAA titles | — | 1 |
| Best jump (m) | — | 2.24 |
| Technique named after him | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 54 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 80 |
Dick Fosbury leads with a GOAT score of 75.5 against 75.3 for Anke Behmer — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Behmer scores higher on honours, longevity. Fosbury leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Behmer: 75.3, Fosbury: 75.5.
Make your case for Behmer vs Fosbury. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.