Who is better, Meyers or Hagan?
Ann Meyers leads with a GOAT score of 81.8 against 81.7 for Cliff Hagan — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ann Meyers above Cliff Hagan: 81.8 vs 81.7. Ann Meyers leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Cliff Hagan leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Meyers wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Hagan wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/ann-meyers-vs-cliff-hagan
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Meyers leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Meyers | 0 | 0 | 55 | 124 | 381 | 488 |
| 🇺🇸 Hagan | 0 | 0 | 5.5 | 25.4 | 73.9 | 173.2 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MeyersRetired | HaganRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic silver medals | 1 | — |
| World Championship titles | 1 | — |
| NCAA All-America selections | 4 | — |
| Quadruple-doubles in NCAA play | 1 | — |
| AIAW titles | 1 | — |
| NBA championships | — | 1 |
| All-Star selections | — | 5 |
| All-NBA selections | — | 2 |
| Career points | — | 13,447 |
| Career points per game | — | 17.7 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 68 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 84 |
Ann Meyers leads with a GOAT score of 81.8 against 81.7 for Cliff Hagan — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hagan scores higher on longevity. Meyers leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Meyers: 81.8, Hagan: 81.7.
Make your case for Meyers vs Hagan. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.