Who is better, Danesi or Rodrigão?
Rodrigão leads with a GOAT score of 87.8 against 87.7 for Anna Danesi — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Danesi vs Rodrigão
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Rodrigão above Anna Danesi: 87.8 vs 87.7. Rodrigão leads on Longevity. Anna Danesi leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
RodrigãoWinner
87.8Rodrigão wins: Longevity
Danesi
87.7Danesi wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Candidates
Locked to VolleyballShareable URL · /compare/anna-danesi-vs-rodrigao-volleyball
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇧🇷 Rodrigão
87.8
Rodrigão leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Rodrigão
2. Anna Danesi
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇮🇹 Anna Danesi5 seasons played · career day 1,825326 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇧🇷 Rodrigão5 seasons played · career day 1,825307 titles
-5.8% vs Danesi at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Danesi | 0 | 0 | 55 | 115 | 326 | 680 |
| 🇧🇷 Rodrigão | 0 | 0 | 52 | 109 | 307 | 636 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Rodrigão87.8
Danesi87.7
FAQ
Where does Danesi beat Rodrigão?
Danesi scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Rodrigão leads on longevity.
How is the Danesi vs Rodrigão score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Danesi: 87.7, Rodrigão: 87.8.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Danesi vs Rodrigão. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.