Who is better, Donovan or Baylor?
Anne Donovan leads with a GOAT score of 85.4 against 85.3 for Elgin Baylor — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Anne Donovan above Elgin Baylor: 85.4 vs 85.3. Anne Donovan leads on Honours. Elgin Baylor leads on Statistics, Dominance, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Donovan wins: Honours
Baylor wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/anne-donovan-vs-elgin-baylor
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Donovan leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Donovan | 0 | 0 | 55 | 118 | 357 | 680 |
| 🇺🇸 Baylor | 0 | 0 | 24.9 | 54.5 | 161.6 | 257.3 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | DonovanRetired | BaylorRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 2 | — |
| World Championship titles | 1 | — |
| NCAA blocks record | 801 | — |
| Naismith Awards | 1 | — |
| Seasons played | 11 | — |
| All-Star selections | — | 11 |
| Career points | — | 23,149 |
| Points per game | — | 27.4 |
| Finals appearances | — | 8 |
| Rookie of the Year | — | 1 |
| All-NBA First Teams | — | 10 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 92 |
Anne Donovan leads with a GOAT score of 85.4 against 85.3 for Elgin Baylor — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Baylor scores higher on dominance, statistics, longevity. Donovan leads on honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Donovan: 85.4, Baylor: 85.3.
Make your case for Donovan vs Baylor. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.