Who is better, Bruhn or Battistelli?
Annika Bruhn leads with a GOAT score of 78.3 against 78.2 for Stefano Battistelli — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Annika Bruhn above Stefano Battistelli: 78.3 vs 78.2. Annika Bruhn leads on Longevity. Stefano Battistelli leads on Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bruhn wins: Longevity
Battistelli wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/annika-bruhn-vs-stefano-battistelli
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bruhn leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Bruhn | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 247 | 626 |
| 🇮🇹 Battistelli | 0 | 0 | 262 | 521 | 1,291.5 | 2,332.5 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BruhnRetired | BattistelliRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European Championship medals | 2 | — |
| German titles | 8 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 2 | — |
| World Championship appearances | 3 | — |
| National records | 3 | — |
| Olympic medals | — | 2 |
| World Championship medals | — | 2 |
| European titles | — | 3 |
| 400 m medley best | — | 256 |
| Olympic Games | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 84 |
Annika Bruhn leads with a GOAT score of 78.3 against 78.2 for Stefano Battistelli — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Battistelli scores higher on peak, statistics. Bruhn leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bruhn: 78.3, Battistelli: 78.2.
Make your case for Bruhn vs Battistelli. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.