Who is better, Sörenstam or Woods?
Tiger Woods leads with a GOAT score of 94.4 against 92.8 for Annika Sörenstam — a gap of 1.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Sörenstam vs Woods
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
WoodsWinner
94.4Woods wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Sörenstam
92.8Sörenstam wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to GolfShareable URL · /compare/annika-sorenstam-vs-tiger-woods
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Tiger Woods
94.4
Woods leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Tiger Woods
2. Annika Sörenstam
Category breakdown
Season form · Wins per season
Career timeline · Wins per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Through age 21 · Wins per season
1. 🇺🇸 Tiger Woods2 wins
1 season by age 21 · 2 per season
Setting the pace at age 21
2. 🇸🇪 Annika Sörenstam0 wins
0 seasons by age 21 · 0 per season
Sörenstam is -100.0% behind Woods's pace at age 21
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | SörenstamRetired | WoodsActive |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 10 | — |
| LPGA wins | 72 | — |
| Player of the Year awards | 8 | 11 |
| Vare Trophies | 6 | — |
| Career prize money (M USD) | 22.6 | — |
| Weeks at No. 1 | 60 | — |
| Major championships | — | 15 |
| PGA Tour wins | — | 82 |
| Weeks at world No. 1 | — | 683 |
| Career prize money (M$) | — | 120.9 |
| Cuts made streak | — | 142 |
| Dominance w25% | 95 | 99 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 100 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 94 |
| Statistics w15% | 95 | 96 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Woods94.4
Sörenstam92.8
FAQ
Where does Sörenstam beat Woods?
Sörenstam scores higher on longevity. Woods leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
How is the Sörenstam vs Woods score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Sörenstam: 92.8, Woods: 94.4.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Sörenstam vs Woods. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.