Who is better, Edwards or Lloyd?
Earl Lloyd leads with a GOAT score of 77.6 against 76.7 for Anthony Edwards — a gap of 0.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Earl Lloyd above Anthony Edwards: 77.6 vs 76.7. Earl Lloyd leads on Longevity, Honours. Anthony Edwards leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Lloyd wins: Longevity, Honours
Edwards wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/anthony-edwards-vs-earl-lloyd
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Lloyd leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Edwards | 0 | 0 | 19.3 | 40.6 | 91.1 | 144.7 |
| 🇺🇸 Lloyd | 0 | 0 | 6.1 | 14.1 | 39.8 | 68.3 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | EdwardsActive · Minnesota Timberwolves | LloydRetired |
|---|---|---|
| All-Star selections | 3 | — |
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| All-NBA teams | 2 | — |
| Points per game peak | 27.6 | — |
| Career points | 8,000 | — |
| NBA titles | — | 1 |
| Games played | — | 560 |
| Career points per game | — | 8.4 |
| Career rebounds per game | — | 6.4 |
| Seasons played | — | 9 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 70 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 58 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 78 |
Earl Lloyd leads with a GOAT score of 77.6 against 76.7 for Anthony Edwards — a gap of 0.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Edwards scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Lloyd leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Edwards: 76.7, Lloyd: 77.6.
Make your case for Edwards vs Lloyd. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.