Who is better, Ervin or Campbell?
Bronte Campbell leads with a GOAT score of 84.1 against 84.0 for Anthony Ervin — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Bronte Campbell above Anthony Ervin: 84.1 vs 84.0. Bronte Campbell leads on Honours, Statistics. Anthony Ervin leads on Longevity, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Campbell wins: Honours, Statistics
Ervin wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/anthony-ervin-vs-bronte-campbell
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Campbell leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Ervin | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 7 |
| 🇦🇺 Campbell | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 32 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ErvinRetired | CampbellActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 3 | — |
| Olympic silver medals | 1 | — |
| World Championship golds | 3 | 5 |
| Years between Olympic 50 m titles | 16 | — |
| NCAA titles | 7 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 3 |
| Commonwealth golds | — | 6 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 3 |
| 100m personal best | — | 52.27 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 86 |
Bronte Campbell leads with a GOAT score of 84.1 against 84.0 for Anthony Ervin — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ervin scores higher on peak, dominance, longevity. Campbell leads on honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ervin: 84.0, Campbell: 84.1.
Make your case for Ervin vs Campbell. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.