Who is better, Muñoz or Faulk?
Anthony Muñoz leads with a GOAT score of 84.8 against 84.8 for Marshall Faulk — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Anthony Muñoz and Marshall Faulk level at 84.8. Anthony Muñoz leads on Longevity, Dominance. Marshall Faulk leads on Statistics, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Muñoz wins: Dominance, Longevity
Faulk wins: Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/anthony-munoz-vs-marshall-faulk
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Muñoz leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Muñoz | 0 | 0 | 16 | 32 | 57 | 133 |
| 🇺🇸 Faulk | 0 | 0 | 1,282 | 2,360 | 5,320 | 10,395 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MuñozRetired | FaulkRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Pro Bowls | 11 | 7 |
| All-Pro First Teams | 9 | — |
| Offensive Lineman of the Year | 3 | — |
| Super Bowl appearances | 2 | — |
| Games started | 185 | — |
| Hall of Fame inductions | 1 | — |
| MVP awards | — | 1 |
| Super Bowl titles | — | 1 |
| Offensive Player of the Year | — | 3 |
| Total yards | — | 19,154 |
| Total touchdowns | — | 136 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 90 |
Anthony Muñoz leads with a GOAT score of 84.8 against 84.8 for Marshall Faulk — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Faulk scores higher on peak, honours, statistics. Muñoz leads on dominance, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Muñoz: 84.8, Faulk: 84.8.
Make your case for Muñoz vs Faulk. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.