Who is better, Wilding or Sharapova?
Anthony Wilding leads with a GOAT score of 82.2 against 82.2 for Maria Sharapova — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Anthony Wilding and Maria Sharapova level at 82.2. Anthony Wilding leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak. Maria Sharapova leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Wilding wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Sharapova wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/anthony-wilding-vs-maria-sharapova
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Wilding leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇿 Wilding | 0 | 0 | 52 | 113 | 346 | 656 |
| 🇷🇺 Sharapova | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 17 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | WildingRetired | SharapovaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major singles titles | 6 | — |
| Wimbledon titles | 4 | — |
| Australasian titles | 2 | — |
| Davis Cup titles | 4 | — |
| Wimbledon finals | 5 | — |
| Grand Slam titles | — | 5 |
| Career Grand Slams | — | 1 |
| Career titles | — | 36 |
| Weeks at No. 1 | — | 21 |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| Tour Finals titles | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 62 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 82 |
Anthony Wilding leads with a GOAT score of 82.2 against 82.2 for Maria Sharapova — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Sharapova scores higher on longevity. Wilding leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Wilding: 82.2, Sharapova: 82.2.
Make your case for Wilding vs Sharapova. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.