Who is better, Cervantes or Hill?
Antonio Cervantes leads with a GOAT score of 89.4 against 89.2 for Virgil Hill — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Cervantes vs Hill
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Antonio Cervantes above Virgil Hill: 89.4 vs 89.2. Antonio Cervantes leads on Dominance, Peak. Virgil Hill leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CervantesWinner
89.4Cervantes wins: Dominance, Peak
Hill
89.2Hill wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/antonio-cervantes-vs-virgil-hill
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇴 Antonio Cervantes
89.4
Cervantes leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Antonio Cervantes
2. Virgil Hill
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Virgil Hill5 years played · career day 1,826289 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇴 Antonio Cervantes5 years played · career day 1,826283 title wins
-2.1% vs Hill at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇴 Cervantes | 0 | 0 | 45 | 96 | 215 | 613 |
| 🇺🇸 Hill | 0 | 0 | 45 | 96 | 218 | 635 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Cervantes89.4
Hill89.2
FAQ
Where does Hill beat Cervantes?
Hill scores higher on longevity. Cervantes leads on peak, dominance.
How is the Cervantes vs Hill score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cervantes: 89.4, Hill: 89.2.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Cervantes vs Hill. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.