Who is better, Pizzonia or Peterson?
Antônio Pizzonia leads with a GOAT score of 65.4 against 64.7 for Ronnie Peterson — a gap of 0.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Antônio Pizzonia above Ronnie Peterson: 65.4 vs 64.7. Antônio Pizzonia leads on Longevity, Statistics, Honours. Ronnie Peterson leads on Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Pizzonia wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Peterson wins: Dominance
Shareable URL · /compare/antonio-pizzonia-vs-ronnie-peterson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Pizzonia leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇷 Pizzonia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 10 | 10 |
| 🇸🇪 Peterson | 0 | 0 | 4 | 37 | 136 | 210 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | PizzoniaRetired | PetersonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grands Prix entered | 20 | — |
| Career points | 10 | — |
| British F3 titles | 1 | — |
| Best race finish | 7 | — |
| Seasons in Formula 1 | 3 | — |
| Grand Prix wins | — | 10 |
| Podiums | — | 26 |
| Pole positions | — | 14 |
| Fastest laps | — | 9 |
| Championship runner-up finishes | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 56 | 66 |
| Peak w20% | 78 | 78 |
| Longevity w20% | 62 | 54 |
| Honours w20% | 60 | 58 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 68 |
Antônio Pizzonia leads with a GOAT score of 65.4 against 64.7 for Ronnie Peterson — a gap of 0.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Peterson scores higher on dominance. Pizzonia leads on honours, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Pizzonia: 65.4, Peterson: 64.7.
Make your case for Pizzonia vs Peterson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.