Who is better, Shrubsole or Ismail?
Anya Shrubsole leads with a GOAT score of 88.0 against 88.0 for Shabnim Ismail — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Anya Shrubsole and Shabnim Ismail level at 88.0. Anya Shrubsole leads on Honours, Peak. Shabnim Ismail leads on Longevity, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Shrubsole wins: Peak, Honours
Ismail wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/anya-shrubsole-vs-shabnim-ismail
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Shrubsole leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Shrubsole | 0 | 0 | 8 | 20 | 56 | 204 |
| 🇿🇦 Ismail | 0 | 0 | 8 | 22 | 88 | 216 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ShrubsoleRetired | IsmailRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| World Cup final figures | 6 | — |
| ODI wickets | 102 | 191 |
| T20I wickets | 102 | 97 |
| Wisden Cricketer of the Year awards | 1 | — |
| Fastest recorded delivery (km/h) | — | 132.1 |
| ODI matches | — | 127 |
| Career best ODI bowling ranking | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 94 |
Anya Shrubsole leads with a GOAT score of 88.0 against 88.0 for Shabnim Ismail — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ismail scores higher on dominance, statistics, longevity. Shrubsole leads on peak, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Shrubsole: 88.0, Ismail: 88.0.
Make your case for Shrubsole vs Ismail. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.