Who is better, Balakhonova or Bolt?
Usain Bolt leads with a GOAT score of 93.2 against 83.2 for Anzhela Balakhonova — a gap of 10.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Usain Bolt above Anzhela Balakhonova: 93.2 vs 83.2. Usain Bolt leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak. Anzhela Balakhonova leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bolt wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Balakhonova wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/anzhela-balakhonova-vs-bolt
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bolt leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Balakhonova — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | BalakhonovaRetired | BoltRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship medals | 1 | — |
| European records set | 1 | — |
| Personal best in centimetres | 460 | — |
| Ukrainian titles | 8 | — |
| Olympic finals | 2 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 8 |
| World golds | — | 11 |
| World records | — | 3 |
| 100m best (s) | — | 9.58 |
| 200m best (s) | — | 19.19 |
| Global finals won | — | 19 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 98 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 100 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 98 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 95 |
Usain Bolt leads with a GOAT score of 93.2 against 83.2 for Anzhela Balakhonova — a gap of 10.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Balakhonova scores higher on longevity. Bolt leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Balakhonova: 83.2, Bolt: 93.2.
Make your case for Balakhonova vs Bolt. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.