GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Hingst vs Wambach

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HingstWinner
88.0

Hingst wins: Peak, Longevity, Honours

Wambach
87.7

Wambach wins: Dominance, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Football

Shareable URL · /compare/ariane-hingst-v-vs-wambach

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇩🇪 Ariane Hingst
88.0

Hingst leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Two-time World Cup winner with 174 caps for Germany.

1. Ariane Hingst
88.0
2. Abby Wambach
87.7

Category breakdown

Season form · Goals per season

Career timeline · Goals per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Goals per season
1. 🇩🇪 Ariane Hingst5 seasons played · career day 1,825302 goals
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Abby Wambach5 seasons played · career day 2,19068 goals
-77.5% vs Hingst at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇩🇪 Hingst0052108302619
🇺🇸 Wambach000459101

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricHingstRetiredWambachRetired
World Cup titles2
European Championship titles4
Germany caps174
Bundesliga titles6
Olympic medals3
International goals184
International caps256
World Cups1
Olympic golds2
FIFA World Player awards1
World Cup goals14
Dominance w25%8487
Peak w20%9089
Longevity w20%8884
Honours w20%9488
Statistics w15%8492

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Hingst88.0
Wambach87.7
The people
Hingst
Wambach

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Hingst vs Wambach. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →