Who is better, Andersson or Redmond?
Arne Andersson leads with a GOAT score of 82.3 against 82.2 for Derek Redmond — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Arne Andersson above Derek Redmond: 82.3 vs 82.2. Arne Andersson leads on Dominance, Statistics, Peak. Derek Redmond leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Andersson wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Redmond wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/arne-andersson-vs-derek-redmond
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Andersson leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Andersson | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 13 |
| 🏴 Redmond | 0 | 0 | 40 | 91 | 310 | 550 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AnderssonRetired | RedmondRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World records | 6 | — |
| Mile world record | 4.01 | — |
| Swedish titles | 6 | — |
| Sub-4:02 miles | 5 | — |
| 1500 m best | 3.44 | — |
| World Championship titles | — | 1 |
| European relay titles | — | 1 |
| Commonwealth relay titles | — | 1 |
| British records set | — | 2 |
| Personal best in seconds | — | 4,494 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 68 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 84 |
Arne Andersson leads with a GOAT score of 82.3 against 82.2 for Derek Redmond — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Redmond scores higher on honours, longevity. Andersson leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Andersson: 82.3, Redmond: 82.2.
Make your case for Andersson vs Redmond. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.