Who is better, arT or es3tag?
Andrei "arT" Piovezan leads with a GOAT score of 79.1 against 79.0 for Patrick "es3tag" Hansen — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Andrei "arT" Piovezan above Patrick "es3tag" Hansen: 79.1 vs 79.0. Andrei "arT" Piovezan leads on Longevity. Patrick "es3tag" Hansen leads on Statistics, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →arT wins: Longevity
es3tag wins: Dominance, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/art-cs-vs-es-es3tag
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
arT leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇷 arT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.98 | 6.02 |
| 🇩🇰 es3tag | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 350 | 681 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | arTActive | es3tagActive |
|---|---|---|
| Big events won | 4 | — |
| Major playoff appearances | 4 | — |
| Seasons as in-game leader | 9 | — |
| Career rating | 1 | — |
| Tier-one teams captained | 1 | — |
| Big tournament titles | — | 4 |
| Major appearances | — | 5 |
| Seasons played | — | 10 |
| Career maps played | — | 1,300 |
| Tournament finals | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 86 |
Andrei "arT" Piovezan leads with a GOAT score of 79.1 against 79.0 for Patrick "es3tag" Hansen — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
es3tag scores higher on dominance, statistics. arT leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. arT: 79.1, es3tag: 79.0.
Make your case for arT vs es3tag. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.