GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Larsen vs Kramer

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
LarsenWinner
82.9

Larsen wins: Longevity, Statistics

Kramer
82.9

Kramer wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/art-larsen-vs-jack-kramer

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Art Larsen
82.9

Larsen leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Tappy won the 1950 US Championships and reached world number two.

1. Art Larsen
82.9
2. Jack Kramer
82.9

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇺🇸 Art Larsen5 seasons played · career day 1,825386 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Jack Kramer5 seasons played · career day 1,826298 titles
-22.8% vs Larsen at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Larsen0055123386638
🇺🇸 Kramer004597224653

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricLarsenRetiredKramerRetired
Grand Slam singles titles1
US clay court titles3
Davis Cup ties2
Seasons played10
World top-ten rankings5
Major singles titles3
US Championships titles2
Wimbledon titles1
World professional titles4
Davis Cup titles2
Dominance w25%8084
Peak w20%9092
Longevity w20%7872
Honours w20%8284
Statistics w15%8682

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Larsen82.9
Kramer82.9
The people
Larsen
Kramer

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Larsen vs Kramer. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →