Who is better, Larsen or Baddeley?
Art Larsen leads with a GOAT score of 82.9 against 82.8 for Wilfred Baddeley — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Art Larsen above Wilfred Baddeley: 82.9 vs 82.8. Art Larsen leads on Longevity, Statistics. Wilfred Baddeley leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Larsen wins: Longevity, Statistics
Baddeley wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/art-larsen-vs-wilfred-baddeley
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Larsen leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Larsen | 0 | 0 | 55 | 123 | 386 | 638 |
| 🏴 Baddeley | 0 | 0 | 45 | 141 | 373 | 521 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | LarsenRetired | BaddeleyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 1 | — |
| US clay court titles | 3 | — |
| Davis Cup ties | 2 | — |
| Seasons played | 10 | — |
| World top-ten rankings | 5 | — |
| Wimbledon singles titles | — | 3 |
| Wimbledon doubles titles | — | 4 |
| Wimbledon finals | — | 6 |
| Age at first title | — | 19 |
| Seasons in competition | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 70 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 84 |
Art Larsen leads with a GOAT score of 82.9 against 82.8 for Wilfred Baddeley — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Baddeley scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Larsen leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Larsen: 82.9, Baddeley: 82.8.
Make your case for Larsen vs Baddeley. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.