Who is better, Arteezy or RUSH?
Artour "Arteezy" Babaev leads with a GOAT score of 84.9 against 84.8 for William "RUSH" Wierzba — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Artour "Arteezy" Babaev above William "RUSH" Wierzba: 84.9 vs 84.8. Artour "Arteezy" Babaev leads on Longevity. William "RUSH" Wierzba leads on Honours, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Arteezy wins: Longevity
RUSH wins: Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/arteezy-dota-vs-es-rush
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Arteezy leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Arteezy | 0 | 0 | 70 | 154 | 432 | 772 |
| 🇺🇸 RUSH | 0 | 0 | 50 | 112 | 366 | 711 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ArteezyActive | RUSHActive |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 4 | — |
| The International appearances | 9 | — |
| Major finals | 8 | — |
| Career prize money (USD m) | 2.6 | — |
| Professional seasons | 12 | — |
| Majors won | — | 1 |
| Big tournament titles | — | 5 |
| Seasons played | — | 11 |
| Major appearances | — | 8 |
| Tournament finals | — | 7 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 88 |
Artour "Arteezy" Babaev leads with a GOAT score of 84.9 against 84.8 for William "RUSH" Wierzba — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
RUSH scores higher on peak, honours, statistics. Arteezy leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Arteezy: 84.9, RUSH: 84.8.
Make your case for Arteezy vs RUSH. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.