Who is better, Carr or Congdon?
Arthur Carr leads with a GOAT score of 82.9 against 82.9 for Bevan Congdon — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Carr vs Congdon
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Arthur Carr and Bevan Congdon level at 82.9. Arthur Carr leads on Longevity. Bevan Congdon leads on Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CarrWinner
82.9Carr wins: Longevity
Congdon
82.9Congdon wins: Peak
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/arthur-carr-vs-bevan-congdon
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Arthur Carr
82.9
Carr leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Arthur Carr
2. Bevan Congdon
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇳🇿 Bevan Congdon5 years played · career day 1,826268 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Arthur Carr5 years played · career day 1,825261 runs
-2.6% vs Congdon at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Carr | 0 | 0 | 45 | 94 | 261 | 535 |
| 🇳🇿 Congdon | 0 | 0 | 45 | 94 | 206 | 559 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Carr82.9
Congdon82.9
FAQ
Where does Congdon beat Carr?
Congdon scores higher on peak. Carr leads on longevity.
How is the Carr vs Congdon score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Carr: 82.9, Congdon: 82.9.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Carr vs Congdon. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.