Who is better, Day or Klaasen?
Heinrich Klaasen leads with a GOAT score of 64.6 against 63.6 for Arthur Day — a gap of 1.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Heinrich Klaasen above Arthur Day: 64.6 vs 63.6. Heinrich Klaasen leads on Honours, Dominance. Arthur Day leads on Longevity, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Klaasen wins: Dominance, Honours
Day wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/arthur-day-criv-vs-ros-heinrich-klaasen
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Klaasen leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Day | 0 | 0 | 40 | 86 | 257 | 540 |
| 🏳️ Klaasen | 0 | 0 | 452 | 484 | 1,678 | 4,833 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | DayRetired | KlaasenActive · Sunrisers Hyderabad |
|---|---|---|
| County Championship titles | 3 | — |
| First-class runs | 6,000 | — |
| First-class centuries | 8 | — |
| First-class matches | 180 | — |
| Career batting average | 30 | — |
| Matches (T20 leagues + internationals) | — | 174 |
| Runs | — | 4,833 |
| Wickets | — | 0 |
| Player of the match | — | 12 |
| Number | — | 45 |
| Dominance w25% | 58 | 68.8 |
| Peak w20% | 70 | 67.7 |
| Longevity w20% | 68 | 50.6 |
| Honours w20% | 58 | 70 |
| Statistics w15% | 66 | 64.7 |
Heinrich Klaasen leads with a GOAT score of 64.6 against 63.6 for Arthur Day — a gap of 1.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Day scores higher on peak, statistics, longevity. Klaasen leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Day: 63.6, Klaasen: 64.6.
Make your case for Day vs Klaasen. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.