Who is better, Farrell or Baun?
Arthur Farrell leads with a GOAT score of 81.0 against 81.0 for Bobby Baun — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Farrell vs Baun
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Arthur Farrell and Bobby Baun level at 81.0. Arthur Farrell leads on Dominance, Statistics, Peak. Bobby Baun leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
FarrellWinner
81.0Farrell wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Baun
81.0Baun wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to Ice HockeyShareable URL · /compare/arthur-farrell-vs-bobby-baun
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇦 Arthur Farrell
81.0
Farrell leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Arthur Farrell
2. Bobby Baun
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇨🇦 Arthur Farrell5 seasons played · career day 1,824346 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇦 Bobby Baun5 seasons played · career day 2,19150 points
-85.5% vs Farrell at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Farrell | 0 | 0 | 60 | 137 | 346 | 346 |
| 🇨🇦 Baun | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 24 | 92 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Farrell81.0
Baun81.0
FAQ
Where does Baun beat Farrell?
Baun scores higher on longevity. Farrell leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
How is the Farrell vs Baun score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Farrell: 81.0, Baun: 81.0.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Farrell vs Baun. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.