GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Farrell vs McNamara

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

Quick answer

GOAT Rank currently ranks Arthur Farrell above George McNamara: 81.0 vs 80.5. Arthur Farrell leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. George McNamara leads on Longevity.

How the GOAT Score is calculated →
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
FarrellWinner
81.0

Farrell wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

McNamara
80.5

McNamara wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Ice Hockey

Shareable URL · /compare/arthur-farrell-vs-george-mcnamara

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇦 Arthur Farrell
81.0

Farrell leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.

1. Arthur Farrell
81.0
2. George McNamara
80.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Form index per season

Career timeline · Form index per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Form index per season
1. 🇨🇦 Arthur Farrell5 seasons played · career day 1,824346 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇦 George McNamara5 seasons played · career day 1,825320 points
-7.5% vs Farrell at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇦 Farrell0060137346346
🇨🇦 McNamara0050107320642

Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.

MetricFarrellRetiredMcNamaraRetired
Stanley Cups21
Career goals2955
Games played26132
Seasons played510
Books written on hockey1—
Allan Cup titles as builder—1
Dominance w25%8076
Peak w20%9086
Longevity w20%6676
Honours w20%8684
Statistics w15%8482

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Farrell81.0
McNamara80.5
The people
Farrell
McNamara

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

FAQ

Who is better, Farrell or McNamara?

Arthur Farrell leads with a GOAT score of 81.0 against 80.5 for George McNamara — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.

Where does McNamara beat Farrell?

McNamara scores higher on longevity. Farrell leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.

How is the Farrell vs McNamara score calculated?

Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Farrell: 81.0, McNamara: 80.5.

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Farrell vs McNamara. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →