Who is better, Farrell or McNamara?
Arthur Farrell leads with a GOAT score of 81.0 against 80.5 for George McNamara — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Arthur Farrell above George McNamara: 81.0 vs 80.5. Arthur Farrell leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. George McNamara leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Farrell wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
McNamara wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/arthur-farrell-vs-george-mcnamara
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Farrell leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Farrell | 0 | 0 | 60 | 137 | 346 | 346 |
| 🇨🇦 McNamara | 0 | 0 | 50 | 107 | 320 | 642 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Arthur Farrell leads with a GOAT score of 81.0 against 80.5 for George McNamara — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
McNamara scores higher on longevity. Farrell leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Farrell: 81.0, McNamara: 80.5.
Make your case for Farrell vs McNamara. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.