GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Gore vs Seixas

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
GoreWinner
86.6

Gore wins: Longevity

Seixas
86.5

Seixas wins: Honours, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/arthur-gore-vs-vic-seixas

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Arthur Gore
86.6

Gore leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Wimbledon's oldest singles champion, winning in 1909 at the age of 41.

1. Arthur Gore
86.6
2. Vic Seixas
86.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Arthur Gore5 seasons played · career day 1,826203 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Vic Seixas5 seasons played · career day 5,47815 titles
-92.6% vs Gore at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Gore003573157416
🇺🇸 Seixas000000

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricGoreRetiredSeixasRetired
Wimbledon singles titles3
Olympic gold medals2
Wimbledon appearances30
Age at final title41
Seasons in competition40
Grand Slam singles titles2
Grand Slam doubles titles5
Grand Slam mixed titles8
Davis Cup titles1
Davis Cup ties played19
Dominance w25%8080
Peak w20%9090
Longevity w20%9690
Honours w20%8488
Statistics w15%8486

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Gore86.6
Seixas86.5
The people
Gore
Seixas

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Gore vs Seixas. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →