Who is better, O'Hara Wood or Slocum?
Henry Slocum leads with a GOAT score of 75.0 against 74.9 for Arthur O'Hara Wood — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
O'Hara Wood vs Slocum
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Henry Slocum above Arthur O'Hara Wood: 75.0 vs 74.9. Henry Slocum leads on Dominance, Honours. Arthur O'Hara Wood leads on Statistics, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
SlocumWinner
75.0Slocum wins: Dominance, Honours
O'Hara Wood
74.9O'Hara Wood wins: Longevity, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to TennisShareable URL · /compare/arthur-ohara-wood-vs-henry-slocum
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Henry Slocum
75.0
Slocum leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Henry Slocum
2. Arthur O'Hara Wood
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇦🇺 Arthur O'Hara Wood5 seasons played · career day 2,19131 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Henry Slocum5 seasons played · career day 1,8256 titles
-80.6% vs O'Hara Wood at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 O'Hara Wood | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 11 | 31 |
| 🇺🇸 Slocum | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 6 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | O'Hara WoodRetired | SlocumRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 1 | — |
| Grand Slam finals | 1 | — |
| National tournament wins | 4 | — |
| Career years | 7 | — |
| Australasian Championships played | 3 | — |
| US Championships titles | — | 2 |
| US doubles titles | — | 1 |
| Grand Slam titles | — | 3 |
| Career span in years | — | 7 |
| US finals reached | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 62 | 58 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 78 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Slocum75.0
O'Hara Wood74.9
FAQ
Where does O'Hara Wood beat Slocum?
O'Hara Wood scores higher on statistics, longevity. Slocum leads on dominance, honours.
How is the O'Hara Wood vs Slocum score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. O'Hara Wood: 74.9, Slocum: 75.0.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for O'Hara Wood vs Slocum. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.