Who is better, Beterbiev or Camacho?
Héctor Camacho leads with a GOAT score of 89.6 against 89.4 for Artur Beterbiev — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Héctor Camacho above Artur Beterbiev: 89.6 vs 89.4. Héctor Camacho leads on Longevity, Honours. Artur Beterbiev leads on Dominance, Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Camacho wins: Longevity, Honours
Beterbiev wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/artur-beterbiev-vs-hector-camacho
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Camacho leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Beterbiev | 0 | 0 | 72 | 150 | 406 | 778 |
| 🇵🇷 Camacho | 0 | 0 | 45 | 99 | 232 | 682 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BeterbievActive | CamachoRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World titles won | 4 | — |
| Undisputed championships | 1 | — |
| Professional wins | 21 | — |
| Knockout percentage | 95 | — |
| World amateur titles | 2 | — |
| World titles in three divisions | — | 3 |
| Career wins | — | 79 |
| Knockouts | — | 38 |
| Career bouts | — | 88 |
| Title fights | — | 17 |
| Dominance w25% | 92 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 92 |
Héctor Camacho leads with a GOAT score of 89.6 against 89.4 for Artur Beterbiev — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Beterbiev scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Camacho leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Beterbiev: 89.4, Camacho: 89.6.
Make your case for Beterbiev vs Camacho. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.