Who is better, Beterbiev or Robinson?
Sugar Ray Robinson leads with a GOAT score of 94.3 against 89.4 for Artur Beterbiev — a gap of 4.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sugar Ray Robinson above Artur Beterbiev: 94.3 vs 89.4. Sugar Ray Robinson leads on Longevity, Honours, Dominance. Artur Beterbiev leads on Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Robinson wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Beterbiev wins: Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/artur-beterbiev-vs-sugar-ray-robinson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Robinson leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Beterbiev | 0 | 0 | 72 | 150 | 406 | 778 |
| 🇺🇸 Robinson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 74 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BeterbievActive | RobinsonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World titles won | 4 | — |
| Undisputed championships | 1 | — |
| Professional wins | 21 | — |
| Knockout percentage | 95 | — |
| World amateur titles | 2 | — |
| World titles | — | 6 |
| Career wins | — | 174 |
| Knockouts | — | 109 |
| Unbeaten run | — | 91 |
| Middleweight titles | — | 5 |
| Ring Magazine Fighter of the Year | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 92 | 95 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 94 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 94 |
Sugar Ray Robinson leads with a GOAT score of 94.3 against 89.4 for Artur Beterbiev — a gap of 4.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Beterbiev scores higher on statistics. Robinson leads on dominance, honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Beterbiev: 89.4, Robinson: 94.3.
Make your case for Beterbiev vs Robinson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.