Who is better, Beterbiev or Hill?
Artur Beterbiev leads with a GOAT score of 89.4 against 89.2 for Virgil Hill — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Artur Beterbiev above Virgil Hill: 89.4 vs 89.2. Artur Beterbiev leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Virgil Hill leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Beterbiev wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Hill wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/artur-beterbiev-vs-virgil-hill
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Beterbiev leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Beterbiev | 0 | 0 | 72 | 150 | 406 | 778 |
| 🇺🇸 Hill | 0 | 0 | 45 | 96 | 218 | 635 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BeterbievActive | HillRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World titles won | 4 | — |
| Undisputed championships | 1 | — |
| Professional wins | 21 | — |
| Knockout percentage | 95 | — |
| World amateur titles | 2 | — |
| World title reigns | — | 5 |
| Title defences | — | 20 |
| Career wins | — | 51 |
| Olympic silver medals | — | 1 |
| Career bouts | — | 58 |
| Dominance w25% | 92 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 92 |
Artur Beterbiev leads with a GOAT score of 89.4 against 89.2 for Virgil Hill — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hill scores higher on honours, longevity. Beterbiev leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Beterbiev: 89.4, Hill: 89.2.
Make your case for Beterbiev vs Hill. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.