Who is better, Sabonis or Haynes?
Arvydas Sabonis leads with a GOAT score of 85.8 against 85.7 for Marques Haynes — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Arvydas Sabonis above Marques Haynes: 85.8 vs 85.7. Arvydas Sabonis leads on Honours, Statistics. Marques Haynes leads on Longevity, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Sabonis wins: Honours, Statistics
Haynes wins: Dominance, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/arvydas-sabonis-vs-marques-haynes
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Sabonis leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇱🇹 Sabonis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46 | 134 |
| 🇺🇸 Haynes | 0 | 0 | 8 | 18 | 60 | 129 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SabonisRetired | HaynesRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| EuroLeague titles | 1 | — |
| European Player of the Year awards | 4 | — |
| Olympic medals | 4 | — |
| NBA seasons | 7 | — |
| Years as a professional | — | 46 |
| Games played worldwide | — | 12,000 |
| Countries played in | — | 97 |
| Hall of Fame inductions | — | 1 |
| Globetrotter seasons | — | 10 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 94 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 82 |
Arvydas Sabonis leads with a GOAT score of 85.8 against 85.7 for Marques Haynes — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Haynes scores higher on dominance, longevity. Sabonis leads on honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Sabonis: 85.8, Haynes: 85.7.
Make your case for Sabonis vs Haynes. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.